§ The result
LoopCV leads Sensei AI by 17 points.
LoopCV finishes 17 points clear of Sensei AI under rubric js-v1.0 — 50 against 33 — across the Auto-apply and Live interview cohorts. LoopCV leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while Sensei AI leads 1, including Data & Credential Safety. Application Honesty is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — LoopCV 55, Sensei AI 20 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage LoopCV holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
LoopCV
LoopCV is a job-search automation platform that continuously matches a job seeker's CV to postings across 30+ job boards and applies on their behalf via ATS form-fills, LinkedIn Easy Apply, and templated emails to recruiters.
Vendor profile
Sensei AI
Sensei AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a candidate's live job interview, transcribes the interviewer's questions and displays structured, resume-tailored answers on screen in about a second, with an added coding copilot and AI resume builder.
§ The record
LoopCV is filed under Auto-apply tools, Sensei AI under Live interview assistance. They also share 1 secondary category: Resume AI.
| Record | LoopCV | Sensei AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | High |
| Headquarters | GR | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
LoopCV 55 · Sensei AI 20
7.0 weighted points to LoopCV
10% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
LoopCV 65 · Sensei AI 38
2.7 weighted points to LoopCV
8% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
LoopCV 68 · Sensei AI 38
2.4 weighted points to LoopCV
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
LoopCV 38 · Sensei AI 25
1.9 weighted points to LoopCV
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
LoopCV 60 · Sensei AI 48
1.8 weighted points to LoopCV
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
LoopCV 35 · Sensei AI 22
1.6 weighted points to LoopCV
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
LoopCV 40 · Sensei AI 42
0.4 weighted points to Sensei AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +17.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LoopCV minus Sensei AI.
| Category | Weight | LoopCV | Sensei AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 55 | 20 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 65 | 38 | +27 | +2.7 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 68 | 38 | +30 | +2.4 |
| Total | 100% | 50 (F) | 33 (F) | +17 | +17.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LoopCV | Sensei AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 2 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LoopCV has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Sensei AI has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LoopCV and Sensei AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for LoopCV, across 6 distinct source domains, and 31 for Sensei AI, across 8 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LoopCV last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sensei AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against