HomeCompareLoxo vs Pin

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Loxo vs Pin

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Pin and Loxo.

Pin holds a 3-point edge over Loxo under rubric v1.0, 40 to 37, with both scored in the Sourcing cohort. The 7 criteria split 2 to 1 in favour of Pin, with 4 level: Pin is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Loxo on Customer Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Loxo 20, Pin 35) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 82% of the weighted advantage Pin holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Loxo and Pin are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Pin is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordLoxoPin
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20122024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Loxo 20 · Pin 35

    2.7 weighted points to Pin

  2. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Loxo 40 · Pin 45

    0.6 weighted points to Pin

  3. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Loxo 58 · Pin 55

    0.2 weighted points to Loxo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 3 figures above sum to -3.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Loxo minus Pin.

CategoryWeightLoxoPinΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2035-15-2.7
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5050--
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4045-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5855+3+0.2
Total100%37 (F)40 (F)-3-3.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLoxoPin
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.