HomeCompareLoxo vs Recruitee

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Loxo vs Recruitee

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Recruitee leads Loxo by 5 points.

Recruitee scores 42 and Loxo 37 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Recruitee leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Loxo leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 2 are level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Loxo 30, Recruitee 42 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Recruitee holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Loxo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Recruitee is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordLoxoRecruitee
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20122015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 41% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Loxo 30 · Recruitee 42

    2.4 weighted points to Recruitee

  2. 18% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Loxo 20 · Recruitee 30

    1.8 weighted points to Recruitee

  3. 12% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Loxo 50 · Recruitee 58

    1.0 weighted points to Recruitee

  4. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Loxo 30 · Recruitee 27

    0.4 weighted points to Loxo

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Loxo 50 · Recruitee 52

    0.3 weighted points to Recruitee

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -5.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Loxo minus Recruitee.

CategoryWeightLoxoRecruiteeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3042-12-2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2030-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%3027+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5052-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%37 (F)42 (F)-5-5.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLoxoRecruitee
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1121Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain147Sources on the vendor's own domain

Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.