HomeCompareLoxo vs Tengai

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Loxo vs Tengai

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tengai leads Loxo by 5 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Tengai, filed under Screening, finishes on 42 and Loxo, filed under Sourcing, on 37, 5 points apart. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to Loxo and Tengai, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Tengai holds, headed by Article 11 Technical Documentation, settle the total. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Loxo 30, Tengai 45 — and at a 20% weight it carries 48% of the weighted advantage Tengai holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Loxo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Tengai is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLoxoTengai
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSSE
Founded20122019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 39% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Loxo 30 · Tengai 45

    3.0 weighted points to Tengai

  2. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Loxo 20 · Tengai 33

    2.3 weighted points to Tengai

  3. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Loxo 50 · Tengai 58

    1.0 weighted points to Tengai

  4. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Loxo 40 · Tengai 33

    0.8 weighted points to Loxo

  5. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Loxo 30 · Tengai 28

    0.3 weighted points to Loxo

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Loxo 58 · Tengai 55

    0.2 weighted points to Loxo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -4.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Loxo minus Tengai.

CategoryWeightLoxoTengaiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3045-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2033-13-2.3
FRIA Support15%3028+2+0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5050--
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4033+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%5855+3+0.2
Total100%37 (F)42 (F)-5-4.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLoxoTengai
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain375Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tengai last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.