§ The result
Maki People leads Pymetrics (Harver Games) by 6 points.
Maki People scores 62 (D) and Pymetrics (Harver Games) 56 (F) under rubric v1.0 — a 6-point gap inside the Assessment cohort. Maki People leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 2 are level. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Maki People 57, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 — and at a 15% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
Maki People and Pymetrics (Harver Games) are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Maki People | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 48% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Maki People 57 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25
4.8 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Maki People 52 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
2.0 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Maki People 62 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70
1.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Maki People 70 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
1.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Maki People 62 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60
0.3 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +6.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Maki People minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | Maki People | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 70 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 80 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 57 | 25 | +32 | +4.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 35 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 70 | 55 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 62 (D) | 56 (F) | +6 | +6.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Maki People | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Maki People has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People and Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Maki People, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Maki People last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next