§ The result
Maki People leads Qureos on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 34 points between Maki People (Assessment) and Qureos (Screening): 67 (D) for Maki People, 33 (F) for Qureos. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria and 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Qureos leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Maki People 80, Qureos 12, 18% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage Maki People builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
§ The record
Maki People is filed under Assessment AI, Qureos under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Maki People | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | AE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Maki People 80 · Qureos 12
12.2 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Maki People 64 · Qureos 28
7.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Maki People 62 · Qureos 25
5.5 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Maki People 64 · Qureos 44
3.0 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Maki People 55 · Qureos 35
2.4 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Maki People 74 · Qureos 52
1.8 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Maki People 66 · Qureos 54
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +33.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 33.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +34 beside that +33.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Maki People minus Qureos.
| Category | Weight | Maki People | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 64 | 28 | +36 | +7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 12 | +68 | +12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 62 | 25 | +37 | +5.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 44 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 54 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 35 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 74 | 52 | +22 | +1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 33 (F) | +34 | +33.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Maki People | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next