§ The result
Maki People leads Recruitly on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 26 points between Maki People (Assessment) and Recruitly (ATS-integrated): 67 (D) for Maki People, 41 (F) for Recruitly. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria, Recruitly none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Maki People 66 to Recruitly 60. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Maki People 80, Recruitly 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 46% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Vendor profile
Recruitly
Recruitly is an all-in-one ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies. It includes AI candidate matching, which ranks candidates against live jobs and shows its reasons, and AI application review, which scores and explains each applicant against the job spec. It also offers external profile sourcing, CV parsing, an AI phone system and an AI meeting assistant.
§ The record
Maki People is filed under Assessment AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Maki People | Recruitly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | FR | AE |
| Founded | 2021 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Maki People 80 · Recruitly 15
11.7 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 62% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Maki People 62 · Recruitly 35
4.0 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Maki People 64 · Recruitly 45
3.8 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Maki People 64 · Recruitly 45
2.9 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Maki People 74 · Recruitly 58
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Maki People 55 · Recruitly 45
1.2 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Maki People 66 · Recruitly 60
0.7 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +25.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +26 beside that +25.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Maki People minus Recruitly.
| Category | Weight | Maki People | Recruitly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 64 | 45 | +19 | +3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 15 | +65 | +11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 62 | 35 | +27 | +4.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 45 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 60 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 74 | 58 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 41 (F) | +26 | +25.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Maki People | Recruitly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 32 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitly last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next