§ The result
Maki People leads Ribbon on all 7 criteria.
Maki People finishes 24 points clear of Ribbon under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 43 (F) — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Maki People leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Ribbon leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Maki People 80, Ribbon 38, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Vendor profile
Ribbon
Ribbon is an AI recruiter that runs voice and video screening interviews with applicants around the clock, scores each interview against default and custom rubrics, ranks candidates for recruiter review, and syncs the results to 60+ applicant tracking systems.
§ The record
Maki People is filed under Assessment AI, Ribbon under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Maki People | Ribbon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | FR | CA |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Maki People 80 · Ribbon 38
7.6 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Maki People 64 · Ribbon 42
4.4 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Maki People 62 · Ribbon 33
4.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Maki People 55 · Ribbon 37
2.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Maki People 64 · Ribbon 50
2.1 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Maki People 66 · Ribbon 55
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Maki People 74 · Ribbon 58
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +23.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Maki People minus Ribbon.
| Category | Weight | Maki People | Ribbon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 64 | 42 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 38 | +42 | +7.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 62 | 33 | +29 | +4.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 50 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 55 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 37 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 74 | 58 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 43 (F) | +24 | +23.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Maki People | Ribbon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 31 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Ribbon has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People and Ribbon sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains, and 35 for Ribbon, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Ribbon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next