§ The result
Maki People leads SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting by 9 points.
Maki People scores 62 (D) and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 53 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Maki People leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Maki People 80, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Vendor profile
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the recruiting module of SAP's cloud HCM suite, using AI (career-site skills matching, job-description generation, resume skills extraction and stack-ranking of applicants) delivered under SAP Business AI and the Joule assistant.
§ The record
Maki People is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Maki People | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | FR | DE |
| Founded | 2021 | 1972 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Maki People 80 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40
7.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Maki People 57 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35
3.3 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Maki People 62 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70
1.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Maki People 50 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62
1.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Maki People 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Maki People 70 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62
0.6 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Maki People 62 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60
0.3 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Maki People minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.
| Category | Weight | Maki People | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 70 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 40 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 57 | 35 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 70 | 62 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 62 (D) | 53 (F) | +9 | +9.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Maki People | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Maki People has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Maki People, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Maki People last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.