§ The result
Pinpoint leads Manatal on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 16 points clear of Manatal inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 57 against 41. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria, Manatal none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Manatal 60 to Pinpoint 64. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Manatal 33, Pinpoint 72 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Manatal
Cloud-based applicant tracking system and recruitment CRM for agencies and HR teams, featuring an AI engine that scores and ranks candidates against job requirements and an asynchronous AI video Interviewer.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Manatal and Pinpoint are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Manatal is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Manatal | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | TH | JE |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Manatal 33 · Pinpoint 72
7.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Manatal 22 · Pinpoint 42
3.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Manatal 52 · Pinpoint 68
2.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Manatal 43 · Pinpoint 52
1.1 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Manatal 33 · Pinpoint 38
0.8 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Manatal 60 · Pinpoint 64
0.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Manatal 62 · Pinpoint 66
0.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Manatal minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Manatal | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 33 | 72 | -39 | -7.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 42 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 38 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 68 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 52 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 66 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 57 (F) | -16 | -16.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Manatal | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Manatal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Manatal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Manatal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next