§ The result
4 points separate Manatal and Toggl Hire.
Manatal (ATS-integrated) edges Toggl Hire (Assessment) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37. Manatal leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Human Oversight Design, while Toggl Hire leads 1, including Data Governance Disclosure. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Manatal 62, Toggl Hire 50) and Human Oversight Design at 12% (Manatal 60, Toggl Hire 52), the second being 22% of the weighted advantage Manatal holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Manatal
Cloud-based applicant tracking system and recruitment CRM for agencies and HR teams, featuring an AI engine that scores and ranks candidates against job requirements and an asynchronous AI video Interviewer.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
Manatal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Manatal | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Low |
| Headquarters | TH | EE |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 20% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Manatal 60 · Toggl Hire 52
1.0 weighted points to Manatal
12% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Manatal 43 · Toggl Hire 35
1.0 weighted points to Manatal
8% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Manatal 62 · Toggl Hire 50
1.0 weighted points to Manatal
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Manatal 33 · Toggl Hire 30
0.6 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Manatal 33 · Toggl Hire 30
0.4 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Manatal 52 · Toggl Hire 55
0.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Manatal 22 · Toggl Hire 20
0.4 weighted points to Manatal
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +3.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Manatal minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | Manatal | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 33 | 30 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 30 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 35 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 37 (F) | +4 | +3.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Manatal | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Manatal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Manatal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Manatal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next