§ The result
Manatal leads Turing by 5 points.
Manatal scores 41 and Turing 36 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Manatal leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Turing leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Manatal 43, Turing 27, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 27% of the weighted advantage Manatal holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Manatal
Cloud-based applicant tracking system and recruitment CRM for agencies and HR teams, featuring an AI engine that scores and ranks candidates against job requirements and an asynchronous AI video Interviewer.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Manatal is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Manatal | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | TH | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 19% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Manatal 43 · Turing 27
1.9 weighted points to Manatal
20% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Manatal 33 · Turing 42
1.8 weighted points to Turing
12% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Manatal 60 · Turing 45
1.8 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Manatal 33 · Turing 25
1.2 weighted points to Manatal
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Manatal 52 · Turing 44
1.2 weighted points to Manatal
8% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Manatal 62 · Turing 48
1.1 weighted points to Manatal
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Manatal 22 · Turing 28
1.1 weighted points to Turing
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Manatal minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Manatal | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 33 | 42 | -9 | -1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 33 | 25 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 44 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 27 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 36 (F) | +5 | +4.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Manatal | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Manatal has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Manatal, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Manatal last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next