HomeComparemicro1 vs Oracle Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

micro1 vs Oracle Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Oracle Recruiting leads micro1 on all 7 criteria.

Oracle Recruiting, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 13 points above micro1, filed under Screening: 49 against 36 under rubric v1.0. Oracle Recruiting takes all 7 criteria from micro1 without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Article 11 Technical Documentation, micro1 50 to Oracle Recruiting 60. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (micro1 45, Oracle Recruiting 62) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (micro1 45, Oracle Recruiting 60), the second being 18% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

micro1 is filed under Screening AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only micro1 is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

Recordmicro1Oracle Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20221977

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 18% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    micro1 45 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    2.3 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  2. 20% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    micro1 50 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    2.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    micro1 22 · Oracle Recruiting 35

    1.9 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  4. 18% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    micro1 20 · Oracle Recruiting 30

    1.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    micro1 25 · Oracle Recruiting 40

    1.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    micro1 48 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    micro1 45 · Oracle Recruiting 62

    1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is micro1 minus Oracle Recruiting.

CategoryWeightmicro1Oracle RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5060-10-2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2030-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%2235-13-1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%4560-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%4860-12-1.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%2540-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%4562-17-1.4
Total100%36 (F)49 (F)-13-12.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightmicro1Oracle Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain12—
FRIA Support15%12Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%22Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%258Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain134Sources on the vendor's own domain

micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for micro1 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
micro1 last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.