§ The result
Recruitee leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Recruitee sits 12 points above Moonhub under rubric v1.0 — 42 against 30 — with Recruitee filed under ATS-integrated and Moonhub under Sourcing. Recruitee leads every one of the 7 criteria, Moonhub none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Moonhub 25 to Recruitee 27. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Moonhub 38, Recruitee 58) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Moonhub 30, Recruitee 42), the second being 21% of the weighted advantage Recruitee holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Moonhub | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2022 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · Recruitee 42
2.4 weighted points to Recruitee
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Recruitee 30
2.2 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Recruitee 40
2.2 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · Recruitee 52
1.8 weighted points to Recruitee
8% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Recruitee 58
1.6 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Recruitee 58
1.2 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · Recruitee 27
0.3 weighted points to Recruitee
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Recruitee.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 30 | -12 | -2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 40 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 42 (F) | -12 | -11.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next