HomeCompareMoonhub vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Moonhub vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting finishes 23 points clear of Moonhub under rubric v1.0 — 53 against 30 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Moonhub leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Moonhub 30, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordMoonhubSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20221972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Moonhub 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    8.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Moonhub 18 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    4.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Moonhub 40 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    3.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Moonhub 22 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    2.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 8% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Moonhub 38 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.9 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Moonhub 48 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.7 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Moonhub 25 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Moonhub minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightMoonhubSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3070-40-8.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%1840-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4060-20-3.0
Human Oversight Design12%4862-14-1.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%2240-18-2.2
Customer Documentation8%3862-24-1.9
Total100%30 (F)53 (F)-23-22.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightMoonhubSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1121Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1130Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1121Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Moonhub last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.