§ The result
SEEK leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, SEEK (Screening) opens a 24-point lead on Moonhub (Sourcing), 54 to 30. Moonhub leads none of the 7 criteria, and SEEK is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Moonhub 30, SEEK 70, 20% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage SEEK builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
SEEK
SEEK runs employment marketplaces in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia (SEEK, Jobstreet and Jobsdb), and its seekAi employer tools label and rank applicants as 'high-fit' using a model trained on millions of past hirer shortlisting decisions, target job ads at predicted high-fit candidates, and run AI voice or text pre-screens, recommended shortlists and reference checks through a feature called Assist.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Moonhub | SEEK |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2022 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · SEEK 70
8.0 weighted points to SEEK
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · SEEK 40
4.0 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · SEEK 50
3.4 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · SEEK 60
3.0 weighted points to SEEK
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · SEEK 64
2.1 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · SEEK 62
1.7 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · SEEK 32
1.1 weighted points to SEEK
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -23.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -23.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus SEEK.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | SEEK | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 70 | -40 | -8.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 40 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 32 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 50 | -28 | -3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 64 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 54 (F) | -24 | -23.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | SEEK | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SEEK last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next