§ The result
Talkpush leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Talkpush finishes 16 points clear of Moonhub under rubric v1.0 — 46 against 30 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Talkpush leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Moonhub leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (Moonhub 18, Talkpush 42) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Moonhub 30, Talkpush 52), the second being 29% of the weighted advantage Talkpush holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Talkpush
Talkpush is a conversational recruitment CRM and applicant tracking system for high-volume hiring that screens candidates over WhatsApp, Messenger, SMS and voice using chatbots, automated workflows (Autoflow), an AI English-proficiency assessment (TalkScore) and an outbound AI voice agent.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talkpush under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Talkpush is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Moonhub | Talkpush |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | HK |
| Founded | 2022 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · Talkpush 52
4.4 weighted points to Talkpush
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Talkpush 42
4.3 weighted points to Talkpush
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Talkpush 46
2.9 weighted points to Talkpush
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Talkpush 60
1.8 weighted points to Talkpush
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Talkpush 56
1.0 weighted points to Talkpush
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · Talkpush 44
0.6 weighted points to Talkpush
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · Talkpush 27
0.3 weighted points to Talkpush
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Talkpush.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Talkpush | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 42 | -24 | -4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 44 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 56 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 46 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 46 (F) | -16 | -15.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Talkpush | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Talkpush has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Talkpush sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for Talkpush, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Talkpush last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next