§ The result
Tezi leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 28 points between Tezi (Screening) and Moonhub (Sourcing): 58 for Tezi, 30 for Moonhub. Tezi leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Moonhub leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Moonhub 18, Tezi 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
Moonhub is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Moonhub | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2022 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Moonhub 18 · Tezi 83
11.7 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Moonhub 30 · Tezi 52
4.4 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Moonhub 22 · Tezi 58
4.3 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Moonhub 40 · Tezi 55
2.3 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Moonhub 25 · Tezi 38
1.9 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Moonhub 48 · Tezi 63
1.8 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Moonhub 38 · Tezi 50
1.0 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -28 beside that -27.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Moonhub minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | Moonhub | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 52 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 83 | -65 | -11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 48 | 63 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 22 | 58 | -36 | -4.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 30 (F) | 58 (F) | -28 | -27.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Moonhub | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next