HomeCompareOleeo vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Oleeo vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Oleeo on 6 of the 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sits 13 points above Oleeo under rubric v1.0, 53 against 40, with both filed under ATS-integrated. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Oleeo is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads is Human Oversight Design, Oleeo 55 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Oleeo 40, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Oleeo and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordOleeoSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersGBDE
Founded19951972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Oleeo 40 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    6.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Oleeo 45 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    2.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Oleeo 25 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Oleeo 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Oleeo 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Oleeo 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -12.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Oleeo minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightOleeoSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4070-30-6.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4040--
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4560-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5562-7-0.6
Total100%40 (F)53 (F)-13-12.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightOleeoSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%106Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Oleeo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oleeo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Oleeo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.