§ The result
PageUp leads Oracle Recruiting on all 7 criteria.
The ATS-integrated cohort pairing of PageUp and Oracle Recruiting comes out 64 (D) to 49 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 15-point lead for PageUp. Of the 7 criteria Oracle Recruiting wins none, and the narrowest lead PageUp holds is on Customer Documentation, Oracle Recruiting 62 to PageUp 63. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Oracle Recruiting 30, PageUp 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 59% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Oracle Recruiting
Oracle Recruiting (part of Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, formerly Oracle Recruiting Cloud) is an enterprise applicant tracking system whose embedded AI suggests and ranks candidates, finds similar candidates, and generates 0-5 generative-AI match ratings against job requisitions to assist recruiters.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Oracle Recruiting and PageUp are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Oracle Recruiting | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 1977 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Oracle Recruiting 30 · PageUp 80
9.0 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Oracle Recruiting 60 · PageUp 74
2.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Oracle Recruiting 40 · PageUp 55
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Oracle Recruiting 35 · PageUp 40
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Oracle Recruiting 60 · PageUp 64
0.5 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Oracle Recruiting 60 · PageUp 63
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Oracle Recruiting 62 · PageUp 63
0.1 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Oracle Recruiting | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 74 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 80 | -50 | -9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 63 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 64 (D) | -15 | -15.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Oracle Recruiting | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next