HomeCompareOracle Recruiting vs Paycor

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Oracle Recruiting vs Paycor

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Oracle Recruiting leads Paycor on all 7 criteria.

Oracle Recruiting scores 49 and Paycor 40 under rubric v1.0 — a 9-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. Oracle Recruiting takes all 7 criteria and Paycor none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, Oracle Recruiting 40 to Paycor 38. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Oracle Recruiting 60, Paycor 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Oracle Recruiting and Paycor are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Sourcing and Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordOracle RecruitingPaycor
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19771990

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Paycor 40

    4.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Paycor 50

    1.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Oracle Recruiting 35 · Paycor 27

    1.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  4. 18% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Oracle Recruiting 30 · Paycor 25

    0.9 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Paycor 55

    0.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 62 · Paycor 55

    0.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Oracle Recruiting 40 · Paycor 38

    0.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus Paycor.

CategoryWeightOracle RecruitingPaycorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6040+20+4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3025+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%3527+8+1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%6050+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6255+7+0.6
Total100%49 (F)40 (F)+9+9.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightOracle RecruitingPaycor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%12—31—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%134Sources on the vendor's own domain246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycor last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.