HomeCompareOracle Recruiting vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Oracle Recruiting vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates Oracle Recruiting and Saville Assessment.

Oracle Recruiting holds a 1-point edge over Saville Assessment under rubric v1.0, 49 to 48, across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Saville Assessment takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for Oracle Recruiting, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Saville Assessment — Oracle Recruiting 30, Saville Assessment 42, on an 18% weight — which is 74% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Oracle Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Saville Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordOracle RecruitingSaville Assessment
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded19772004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Oracle Recruiting 30 · Saville Assessment 42

    2.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 20% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Saville Assessment 50

    2.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Oracle Recruiting 35 · Saville Assessment 40

    0.8 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Oracle Recruiting 40 · Saville Assessment 38

    0.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 62 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightOracle RecruitingSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6050+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3042-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3540-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6055+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%49 (F)48 (F)+1+0.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightOracle RecruitingSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%12—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%134Sources on the vendor's own domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.