HomeCompareOracle Recruiting vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Oracle Recruiting vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Oracle Recruiting on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters sits 13 points above Oracle Recruiting under rubric v1.0, 62 (D) against 49 (F), with both filed under ATS-integrated. SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria, Oracle Recruiting none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Oracle Recruiting 62 to SmartRecruiters 63. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Oracle Recruiting 30, SmartRecruiters 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 63% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Oracle Recruiting and SmartRecruiters are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Sourcing and Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordOracle RecruitingSmartRecruiters
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19772010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Oracle Recruiting 30 · SmartRecruiters 78

    8.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · SmartRecruiters 70

    2.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Oracle Recruiting 35 · SmartRecruiters 45

    1.5 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Oracle Recruiting 40 · SmartRecruiters 48

    1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · SmartRecruiters 62

    0.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · SmartRecruiters 62

    0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 62 · SmartRecruiters 63

    0.1 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -13.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightOracle RecruitingSmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6070-10-2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3078-48-8.6
FRIA Support15%3545-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%6062-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6062-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4048-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%6263-1-0.1
Total100%49 (F)62 (D)-13-13.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightOracle RecruitingSmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1210Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%134Sources on the vendor's own domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.