§ The result
Oracle Recruiting leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Oracle Recruiting sits 13 points above Turing under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 36 — with Oracle Recruiting filed under ATS-integrated and Turing under Assessment. Oracle Recruiting is ahead of Turing on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at Oracle Recruiting 30 to Turing 28. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Oracle Recruiting 60, Turing 42, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 29% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Oracle Recruiting
Oracle Recruiting (part of Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, formerly Oracle Recruiting Cloud) is an enterprise applicant tracking system whose embedded AI suggests and ranks candidates, finds similar candidates, and generates 0-5 generative-AI match ratings against job requisitions to assist recruiters.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Oracle Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Turing is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Oracle Recruiting | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1977 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Oracle Recruiting 60 · Turing 42
3.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
15% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Oracle Recruiting 60 · Turing 44
2.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
12% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Oracle Recruiting 60 · Turing 45
1.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Oracle Recruiting 40 · Turing 27
1.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Oracle Recruiting 35 · Turing 25
1.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Oracle Recruiting 62 · Turing 48
1.1 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Oracle Recruiting 30 · Turing 28
0.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Oracle Recruiting | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 44 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 27 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 49 (F) | 36 (F) | +13 | +12.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Oracle Recruiting | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next