§ The result
PageUp leads Personio on all 7 criteria.
The ATS-integrated cohort pairing of PageUp and Personio comes out 64 (D) to 40 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 24-point lead for PageUp. Of the 7 criteria Personio wins none, and the narrowest lead PageUp holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, PageUp 55 to Personio 48. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (PageUp 80, Personio 25) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Personio
Personio is a European cloud HR platform for small and mid-sized companies that combines an HRIS with recruiting/ATS, time tracking, payroll and an AI assistant, and is adding agentic AI candidate sourcing and application screening through its 2026 acquisition of aurio.
§ The record
PageUp and Personio are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | PageUp | Personio |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | DE |
| Founded | 1997 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Personio 25
9.9 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Personio 40
6.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Personio 48
1.9 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Personio 52
1.6 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Personio 30
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Personio 50
1.0 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Personio 48
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +23.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Personio.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Personio | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 40 | +34 | +6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 25 | +55 | +9.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 52 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 48 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 50 | +13 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 40 (F) | +24 | +23.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Personio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Personio has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp and Personio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Personio, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Personio last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next