§ The result
PageUp leads Recruitee on all 7 criteria.
PageUp finishes 22 points clear of Recruitee inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 64 (D) against 42 (F). Of the 7 criteria Recruitee wins none, and the narrowest lead PageUp holds is on Customer Documentation, PageUp 63 to Recruitee 58. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — PageUp 80, Recruitee 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
§ The record
PageUp and Recruitee are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | PageUp | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | NL |
| Founded | 1997 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Recruitee 30
9.0 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Recruitee 42
6.4 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Recruitee 27
1.9 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Recruitee 40
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Recruitee 52
1.6 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Recruitee 58
0.7 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Recruitee 58
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +21.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Recruitee.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 42 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 30 | +50 | +9.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 27 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 52 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 58 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 58 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 42 (F) | +22 | +21.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next