§ The result
PageUp leads Recruiterflow on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp scores 64 (D) to 36 (F) for Recruiterflow, a 28-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Recruiterflow leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (PageUp 80, Recruiterflow 18) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 40% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Recruiterflow
Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM for recruiting agencies and executive search firms. Its AIRA AI layer ranks candidates already in a firm's database against each job with an explainable 0–100 Criteria Score (AIRA Matchmaker, shown as the 'AI Matches' card), and adds natural-language candidate search, external profile sourcing and an AI call notetaker that fills in interview scorecards.
§ The record
PageUp and Recruiterflow are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only PageUp is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | PageUp | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 1997 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Recruiterflow 18
11.2 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Recruiterflow 33
8.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Recruiterflow 44
2.9 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Recruiterflow 33
2.6 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Recruiterflow 30
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Recruiterflow 58
0.7 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Recruiterflow 56
0.6 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +27.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +27.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Recruiterflow.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Recruiterflow | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 33 | +41 | +8.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 18 | +62 | +11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 44 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 58 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 33 | +22 | +2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 56 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 36 (F) | +28 | +27.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Recruiterflow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Recruiterflow has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Recruiterflow, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruiterflow last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next