§ The result
PageUp leads Rippling by 8 points.
PageUp finishes 8 points ahead of Rippling under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) to 56 (F), both scored as ATS-integrated entries. PageUp leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Rippling leads 3, including FRIA Support. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (PageUp 80, Rippling 42) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 81% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Rippling
Rippling Recruiting is an applicant tracking system within Rippling's all-in-one HR/IT/finance platform that uses AI to review and screen job applications, summarize interviewer feedback, transcribe video interviews, flag application fraud, and automate interview scheduling.
§ The record
PageUp and Rippling are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only PageUp is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | PageUp | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 1997 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Rippling 42
6.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Rippling 47
1.0 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Rippling 45
0.8 weighted points to Rippling
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Rippling 60
0.5 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Rippling 73
0.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Rippling 64
0.1 weighted points to Rippling
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Rippling 64
0.1 weighted points to Rippling
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Rippling.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Rippling | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 73 | +1 | +0.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 42 | +38 | +6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 64 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 60 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 47 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 64 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 56 (F) | +8 | +7.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Rippling | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Rippling has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for Rippling, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rippling last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next