HomeComparePageUp vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

PageUp vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

PageUp leads SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting on all 7 criteria.

Rubric v1.0 scores the ATS-integrated entries PageUp and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting at 64 (D) and 53 (F), a gap of 11 points. Of the 7 criteria SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting wins none, and the narrowest lead PageUp holds is on Customer Documentation, PageUp 63 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — PageUp 80, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 64% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

PageUp and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordPageUpSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersAUDE
Founded19971972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    PageUp 80 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    7.2 weighted points to PageUp

  2. 12% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    PageUp 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.8 weighted points to PageUp

  3. 20% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    PageUp 74 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    0.8 weighted points to PageUp

  4. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    PageUp 40 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to PageUp

  5. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    PageUp 63 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.4 weighted points to PageUp

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    PageUp 64 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to PageUp

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    PageUp 63 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.1 weighted points to PageUp

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is PageUp minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightPageUpSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7470+4+0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%8040+40+7.2
FRIA Support15%4035+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6360+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6462+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%5540+15+1.8
Customer Documentation8%6362+1+0.1
Total100%64 (D)53 (F)+11+11.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPageUpSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%40Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%244Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
PageUp last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.