§ The result
PageUp leads Tengai on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp (ATS-integrated) opens a 22-point lead on Tengai (Screening), 64 (D) to 42 (F). Tengai leads none of the 7 criteria, and PageUp is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (PageUp 80, Tengai 33, 18% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage PageUp builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Vendor profile
Tengai
Tengai runs structured screening interviews through a browser-based AI avatar and combines candidates' yes/no qualification answers, a Five-Factor-based personality score and recruiter ratings of open answers into an automatically ranked shortlist.
§ The record
PageUp is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Tengai is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | PageUp | Tengai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | AU | SE |
| Founded | 1997 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
PageUp 80 · Tengai 33
8.5 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
PageUp 74 · Tengai 45
5.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
PageUp 55 · Tengai 33
2.6 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
PageUp 63 · Tengai 50
1.9 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
PageUp 40 · Tengai 28
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
PageUp 64 · Tengai 58
0.7 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
PageUp 63 · Tengai 55
0.6 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +22.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +22.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is PageUp minus Tengai.
| Category | Weight | PageUp | Tengai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 45 | +29 | +5.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 33 | +47 | +8.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 28 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 50 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 58 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 33 | +22 | +2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 55 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 42 (F) | +22 | +22.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | PageUp | Tengai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 37 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp and Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tengai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next