HomeCompareParadox vs Recruitly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Paradox vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Paradox and Recruitly tie at 41.

Paradox, filed under Scheduling, and Recruitly, filed under ATS-integrated, tie at 41 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Paradox leads 1 of the 7 criteria and Recruitly 5, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Paradox 50, Recruitly 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage Paradox holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

Paradox is filed under Scheduling AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordParadoxRecruitly
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSAE
Founded20162015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Paradox 50 · Recruitly 15

    6.3 weighted points to Paradox

  2. 15% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Paradox 25 · Recruitly 35

    1.5 weighted points to Recruitly

  3. 12% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Paradox 50 · Recruitly 60

    1.2 weighted points to Recruitly

  4. 12% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Paradox 35 · Recruitly 45

    1.2 weighted points to Recruitly

  5. 8% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Paradox 45 · Recruitly 58

    1.0 weighted points to Recruitly

  6. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Paradox 40 · Recruitly 45

    1.0 weighted points to Recruitly

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Paradox minus Recruitly.

CategoryWeightParadoxRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4045-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5015+35+6.3
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4545--
Human Oversight Design12%5060-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3545-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%4558-13-1.0
Total100%41 (F)41 (F)-+0.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightParadoxRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%10—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%82Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Paradox has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paradox sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 10 for Paradox, across 2 distinct source domains, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Paradox last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.