Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Paradox vs UKG
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
Vendor profile
UKG
UKG is an enterprise HCM and workforce-management suite whose UKG Pro Recruiting applicant-tracking module, augmented by the embedded Bryte AI layer, drafts job descriptions and produces profile-match candidate scores to rank and shortlist applicants.
44
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Paradox minus UKG.
| Category | Weight | Paradox | UKG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 48 | -8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 50 | 30 | +20 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 56 | -11 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 52 | -2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 38 | -3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 55 | -10 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 44 (F) | -3 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2
Evidence count
UKG
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 8
- audit report
- 1