HomeComparePin vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Pin vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pin leads SeekOut by 6 points.

Inside the Sourcing cohort, rubric v1.0 puts Pin on 40 and SeekOut on 34, 6 points apart. Pin leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while SeekOut leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. The advantage Pin holds is spread out: Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Pin 45, SeekOut 25, 12% weight), yet it supplies only 32% of the weighted points Pin gains across the 5 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Pin and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Pin is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordPinSeekOut
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20242017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 25% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Pin 45 · SeekOut 25

    2.4 weighted points to Pin

  2. 15% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Pin 50 · SeekOut 35

    2.3 weighted points to Pin

  3. 8% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Pin 55 · SeekOut 35

    1.6 weighted points to Pin

  4. 20% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Pin 30 · SeekOut 35

    1.0 weighted points to SeekOut

  5. 18% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Pin 35 · SeekOut 40

    0.9 weighted points to SeekOut

  6. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Pin 30 · SeekOut 25

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Pin 50 · SeekOut 45

    0.6 weighted points to Pin

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Pin minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeightPinSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3035-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3540-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5035+15+2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5045+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4525+20+2.4
Customer Documentation8%5535+20+1.6
Total100%40 (F)34 (F)+6+5.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPinSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.