HomeComparePlum vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Plum vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Plum takes the total, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting takes more of the criteria.

Plum (Assessment) edges SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 54 to 53. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads more of the criteria than Plum — 5 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Plum leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Plum. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Plum 83, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 99% of the weighted advantage Plum holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Plum is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Plum is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPlumSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersCADE
Founded20121972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Plum 83 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    7.7 weighted points to Plum

  2. 20% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Plum 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    2.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Plum 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Plum 28 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Plum 54 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.9 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Plum 36 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Plum 63 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.1 weighted points to Plum

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Plum minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightPlumSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5870-12-2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%8340+43+7.7
FRIA Support15%2835-7-1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5460-6-0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5262-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3640-4-0.5
Customer Documentation8%6362+1+0.1
Total100%54 (F)53 (F)+1+1.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPlumSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%154Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Plum has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Plum, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Plum last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.