§ The result
Plum leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Plum finishes 18 points clear of Turing inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 54 against 36. Plum leads every one of the 7 criteria, Turing none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Plum 28 to Turing 25. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Plum 83, Turing 28 — and at an 18% weight it carries 54% of the weighted advantage Plum holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Plum and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Plum | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Plum 83 · Turing 28
9.9 weighted points to Plum
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Plum 58 · Turing 42
3.2 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Plum 54 · Turing 44
1.5 weighted points to Plum
8% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Plum 63 · Turing 48
1.2 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Plum 36 · Turing 27
1.1 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Plum 52 · Turing 45
0.8 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Plum 28 · Turing 25
0.4 weighted points to Plum
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +18.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +18.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Plum minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Plum | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 28 | +55 | +9.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 44 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 27 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 48 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 54 (F) | 36 (F) | +18 | +18.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Plum | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 15 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Plum has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Plum, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Plum last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next