§ The result
The Predictive Index leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
The Predictive Index sits 12 points above Turing under rubric v1.0, 48 against 36, with both filed under Assessment. The Predictive Index is ahead of Turing on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at The Predictive Index 52 to Turing 45. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (The Predictive Index 45, Turing 28, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 27% of the weighted advantage The Predictive Index holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
The Predictive Index and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | The Predictive Index | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1955 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
The Predictive Index 45 · Turing 28
3.1 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
The Predictive Index 43 · Turing 27
1.9 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
The Predictive Index 55 · Turing 44
1.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index
20% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
The Predictive Index 50 · Turing 42
1.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
The Predictive Index 35 · Turing 25
1.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
The Predictive Index 60 · Turing 48
1.0 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
The Predictive Index 52 · Turing 45
0.8 weighted points to The Predictive Index
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +11.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is The Predictive Index minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | The Predictive Index | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 45 | 28 | +17 | +3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 44 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 27 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 48 (F) | 36 (F) | +12 | +11.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | The Predictive Index | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next