§ The result
Test Partnership leads Prevue HR by 6 points.
Test Partnership scores 50 and Prevue HR 44 under rubric v1.0 — a 6-point gap inside the Assessment cohort. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Test Partnership: Test Partnership is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Prevue HR on Post-Market Monitoring. The advantage Test Partnership holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Prevue HR 45, Test Partnership 57, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points Test Partnership gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
Vendor profile
Test Partnership
Test Partnership publishes computer-adaptive aptitude tests, the TPAQ personality questionnaire and MindmetriQ game-based cognitive assessments. Employers review, rank and export the resulting norm-referenced percentile and sten scores in its dashboard, through its API or in integrated ATSs.
§ The record
Prevue HR and Test Partnership are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Prevue HR | Test Partnership |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | CA | GB |
| Founded | 1994 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Prevue HR 45 · Test Partnership 57
2.4 weighted points to Test Partnership
15% weight · 50% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Prevue HR 27 · Test Partnership 36
1.3 weighted points to Test Partnership
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Prevue HR 48 · Test Partnership 57
1.3 weighted points to Test Partnership
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Prevue HR 40 · Test Partnership 33
0.8 weighted points to Prevue HR
18% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Prevue HR 44 · Test Partnership 48
0.7 weighted points to Test Partnership
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Prevue HR 54 · Test Partnership 58
0.5 weighted points to Test Partnership
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Prevue HR 58 · Test Partnership 62
0.3 weighted points to Test Partnership
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Prevue HR minus Test Partnership.
| Category | Weight | Prevue HR | Test Partnership | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 57 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 48 | -4 | -0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 36 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 57 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 50 (F) | -6 | -5.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Prevue HR | Test Partnership | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Test Partnership has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR and Test Partnership sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Test Partnership, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Test Partnership last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next