§ The result
Prevue HR leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Prevue HR finishes 8 points ahead of Turing under rubric v1.0, 44 to 36, both scored as Assessment entries. Prevue HR is ahead of Turing on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Prevue HR 27 to Turing 25. The advantage Prevue HR holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Prevue HR 44, Turing 28, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 37% of the weighted points Prevue HR gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
Prevue HR and Turing are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Prevue HR | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 1994 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Prevue HR 44 · Turing 28
2.9 weighted points to Prevue HR
12% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Prevue HR 40 · Turing 27
1.6 weighted points to Prevue HR
12% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Prevue HR 54 · Turing 45
1.1 weighted points to Prevue HR
8% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Prevue HR 58 · Turing 48
0.8 weighted points to Prevue HR
20% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Prevue HR 45 · Turing 42
0.6 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Prevue HR 48 · Turing 44
0.6 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Prevue HR 27 · Turing 25
0.3 weighted points to Prevue HR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Prevue HR minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Prevue HR | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 42 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 28 | +16 | +2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 25 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 44 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 45 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 27 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 36 (F) | +8 | +7.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Prevue HR | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next