§ The result
Prevue HR leads XOR on all 7 criteria.
Prevue HR sits 14 points above XOR under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 30 — with Prevue HR filed under Assessment and XOR under Screening. Prevue HR takes all 7 criteria and XOR none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, Prevue HR 27 to XOR 25. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (Prevue HR 44, XOR 18) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Prevue HR 45, XOR 20), 35% of the weighted advantage Prevue HR builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
Vendor profile
XOR
XOR is a text-first conversational-AI recruiting platform that pre-screens and scores high-volume and hourly candidates with recruiter-defined knockout/scoring questions over SMS, WhatsApp, and Messenger, then auto-schedules interviews on the recruiter's calendar.
§ The record
Prevue HR is filed under Assessment AI, XOR under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Prevue HR is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Prevue HR | XOR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | CA | US |
| Founded | 1994 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Prevue HR 45 · XOR 20
5.0 weighted points to Prevue HR
18% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Prevue HR 44 · XOR 18
4.7 weighted points to Prevue HR
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Prevue HR 54 · XOR 40
1.7 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Prevue HR 48 · XOR 42
0.9 weighted points to Prevue HR
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Prevue HR 40 · XOR 33
0.8 weighted points to Prevue HR
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Prevue HR 58 · XOR 48
0.8 weighted points to Prevue HR
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Prevue HR 27 · XOR 25
0.3 weighted points to Prevue HR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +14.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +14.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Prevue HR minus XOR.
| Category | Weight | Prevue HR | XOR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 20 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 44 | 18 | +26 | +4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 27 | 25 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 48 | 42 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 40 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 33 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 30 (F) | +14 | +14.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Prevue HR | XOR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; XOR has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Prevue HR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for XOR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- XOR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next