§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) and Tenzo AI tie at 56.
Pymetrics (Harver Games) (Assessment) and Tenzo AI (Screening) tie at 56 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads 2 of the 7 criteria and Tenzo AI 5, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70, Tenzo AI 45) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 87% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
Vendor profile
Tenzo AI
Tenzo AI's AI recruiter, Morgan, screens and interviews applicants by phone, SMS, email, WhatsApp or video in 40+ languages, scores them against employer-defined rubrics with fraud and identity checks, schedules next rounds, and writes scores, transcripts and recordings back to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Pymetrics (Harver Games) is filed under Assessment AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Tenzo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 · Tenzo AI 45
5.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 · Tenzo AI 40
2.3 weighted points to Tenzo AI
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · Tenzo AI 60
1.2 weighted points to Tenzo AI
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · Tenzo AI 45
1.2 weighted points to Tenzo AI
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · Tenzo AI 55
0.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · Tenzo AI 62
0.6 weighted points to Tenzo AI
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · Tenzo AI 83
0.5 weighted points to Tenzo AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to 0.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that 0.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus Tenzo AI.
| Category | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Tenzo AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 45 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 83 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 45 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 56 (F) | - | 0.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Tenzo AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) and Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tenzo AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next