§ The result
2 points separate Tezi and Pymetrics (Harver Games).
Tezi (Screening) edges Pymetrics (Harver Games) (Assessment) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 58 to 56. Tezi leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads 3, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — Pymetrics (Harver Games) takes Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20%, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 to Tezi 52, 76% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Post-Market Monitoring, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 to Tezi 58.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
Pymetrics (Harver Games) is filed under Assessment AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2013 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 · Tezi 52
3.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · Tezi 58
2.8 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 · Tezi 38
1.9 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · Tezi 63
1.6 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · Tezi 55
0.8 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
18% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · Tezi 83
0.5 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · Tezi 50
0.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 52 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 83 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 63 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 58 | -23 | -2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 56 (F) | 58 (F) | -2 | -2.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 25 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next