HomeComparePymetrics (Harver Games) vs Wellfound

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Pymetrics (Harver Games) vs Wellfound

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Pymetrics (Harver Games) takes the total, Wellfound takes more of the criteria.

Pymetrics (Harver Games) (Assessment) edges Wellfound (Screening) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 56 to 52. Wellfound leads more of the criteria than Pymetrics (Harver Games) — 5 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Pymetrics (Harver Games). Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70, Wellfound 40 — and at a 20% weight it carries 73% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Pymetrics (Harver Games) is filed under Assessment AI, Wellfound under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordPymetrics (Harver Games)Wellfound
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20132012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70 · Wellfound 40

    6.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  2. 12% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35 · Wellfound 60

    3.0 weighted points to Wellfound

  3. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60 · Wellfound 45

    2.3 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  4. 15% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25 · Wellfound 28

    0.4 weighted points to Wellfound

  5. 18% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 · Wellfound 82

    0.4 weighted points to Wellfound

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50 · Wellfound 52

    0.2 weighted points to Wellfound

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55 · Wellfound 58

    0.2 weighted points to Wellfound

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Pymetrics (Harver Games) minus Wellfound.

CategoryWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)WellfoundΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7040+30+6.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%8082-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%2528-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6045+15+2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5052-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3560-25-3.0
Customer Documentation8%5558-3-0.2
Total100%56 (F)52 (F)+4+4.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightPymetrics (Harver Games)Wellfound
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%20Sources on a separate domain22Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0112
Data Governance Disclosure15%10Sources on a separate domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%1131Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%92Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain229Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Wellfound has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) and Wellfound sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains, and 27 for Wellfound, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Wellfound last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.