§ The result
SeekOut takes the total, Qureos takes more of the criteria.
SeekOut (Sourcing) edges Qureos (Screening) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 34 to 33. Qureos leads more of the criteria than SeekOut — 4 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which SeekOut leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to SeekOut. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Qureos 12, SeekOut 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 78% of the weighted advantage SeekOut holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Vendor profile
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
§ The record
Qureos is filed under Screening AI, SeekOut under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Qureos is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Qureos | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AE | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Qureos 12 · SeekOut 40
5.0 weighted points to SeekOut
20% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Qureos 28 · SeekOut 35
1.4 weighted points to SeekOut
8% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Qureos 52 · SeekOut 35
1.4 weighted points to Qureos
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Qureos 44 · SeekOut 35
1.3 weighted points to Qureos
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Qureos 35 · SeekOut 25
1.2 weighted points to Qureos
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Qureos 54 · SeekOut 45
1.1 weighted points to Qureos
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Qureos minus SeekOut.
| Category | Weight | Qureos | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 40 | -28 | -5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 35 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 45 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 35 | +17 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 34 (F) | -1 | -1.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Qureos | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next