§ The result
TestGorilla leads Qureos on all 7 criteria.
TestGorilla sits 14 points above Qureos under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 33 — with TestGorilla filed under Assessment and Qureos under Screening. Of the 7 criteria Qureos wins none, and the narrowest lead TestGorilla holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, Qureos 35 to TestGorilla 38. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (Qureos 12, TestGorilla 38) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Qureos 28, TestGorilla 52), 35% of the weighted advantage TestGorilla builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Vendor profile
TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform offering a large test library plus AI features for resume scoring, candidate sourcing, and one-way/conversational AI video interviews to support skills-based hiring.
§ The record
Qureos is filed under Screening AI, TestGorilla under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Qureos | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AE | NL |
| Founded | 2021 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Qureos 28 · TestGorilla 52
4.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
18% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Qureos 12 · TestGorilla 38
4.7 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Qureos 44 · TestGorilla 56
1.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Qureos 25 · TestGorilla 30
0.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Qureos 54 · TestGorilla 60
0.7 weighted points to TestGorilla
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Qureos 52 · TestGorilla 58
0.5 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Qureos 35 · TestGorilla 38
0.4 weighted points to TestGorilla
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Qureos minus TestGorilla.
| Category | Weight | Qureos | TestGorilla | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 38 | -26 | -4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 56 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 60 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 47 (F) | -14 | -13.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Qureos | TestGorilla | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestGorilla last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next