§ The result
Tribepad leads Qureos on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Tribepad (ATS-integrated) opens a 23-point lead on Qureos (Screening), 56 to 33. Tribepad leads every one of the 7 criteria, Qureos none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Qureos 54 to Tribepad 58. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Qureos 12, Tribepad 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
Qureos is filed under Screening AI, Tribepad under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Qureos is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Qureos | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AE | GB |
| Founded | 2021 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Qureos 12 · Tribepad 78
11.9 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Qureos 28 · Tribepad 56
5.6 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Qureos 35 · Tribepad 54
2.3 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Qureos 44 · Tribepad 56
1.8 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Qureos 25 · Tribepad 30
0.8 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Qureos 54 · Tribepad 58
0.5 weighted points to Tribepad
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Qureos 52 · Tribepad 58
0.5 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -23.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -23.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Qureos minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | Qureos | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 56 | -28 | -5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 78 | -66 | -11.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 56 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 54 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 56 (F) | -23 | -23.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Qureos | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next