§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Qureos on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Workday Recruiting AI (ATS-integrated) opens a 23-point lead on Qureos (Screening), 56 to 33. Qureos is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Workday Recruiting AI takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is FRIA Support, Qureos 25 to Workday Recruiting AI 35. The advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Qureos 12, Workday Recruiting AI 60, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points Workday Recruiting AI gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Qureos is filed under Screening AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Qureos is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Qureos | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AE | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Qureos 12 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
8.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Qureos 28 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
8.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Qureos 44 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
1.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Qureos 25 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Qureos 54 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.3 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Qureos 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -22.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Qureos minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Qureos | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 60 | -48 | -8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 65 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 56 (F) | -23 | -22.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Qureos | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next