HomeCompareRecruit CRM vs Ribbon

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Recruit CRM vs Ribbon

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Ribbon takes the total, Recruit CRM takes more of the criteria.

Ribbon holds a 3-point edge over Recruit CRM under rubric v1.0, 43 to 40, across the Screening and ATS-integrated cohorts. Recruit CRM leads more of the criteria, 5 against 2 for Ribbon, yet Ribbon takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Recruit CRM 20, Ribbon 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 67% of the weighted advantage Ribbon holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Recruit CRM is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Ribbon under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Ribbon is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordRecruit CRMRibbon
Price tierLowLow
HeadquartersUSCA
FoundedNot recorded2020

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Recruit CRM 20 · Ribbon 38

    3.2 weighted points to Ribbon

  2. 20% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Recruit CRM 34 · Ribbon 42

    1.6 weighted points to Ribbon

  3. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Recruit CRM 54 · Ribbon 50

    0.6 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  4. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Recruit CRM 42 · Ribbon 37

    0.6 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Recruit CRM 58 · Ribbon 55

    0.4 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Recruit CRM 60 · Ribbon 58

    0.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Recruit CRM 34 · Ribbon 33

    0.1 weighted points to Recruit CRM

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Recruit CRM minus Ribbon.

CategoryWeightRecruit CRMRibbonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3442-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2038-18-3.2
FRIA Support15%3433+1+0.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5450+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4237+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%40 (F)43 (F)-3-3.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRecruit CRMRibbon
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—41Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%305Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain314Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Ribbon has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM and Ribbon sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Ribbon, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Recruit CRM last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Ribbon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.