§ The result
SEEK leads Recruit CRM by 14 points.
SEEK sits 14 points above Recruit CRM under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 40 — with SEEK filed under Screening and Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated. SEEK leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Recruit CRM leads 1, including FRIA Support. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Recruit CRM 34, SEEK 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 53% of the weighted advantage SEEK holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
Vendor profile
SEEK
SEEK runs employment marketplaces in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia (SEEK, Jobstreet and Jobsdb), and its seekAi employer tools label and rank applicants as 'high-fit' using a model trained on millions of past hirer shortlisting decisions, target job ads at predicted high-fit candidates, and run AI voice or text pre-screens, recommended shortlists and reference checks through a feature called Assist.
§ The record
Recruit CRM is filed under ATS-integrated AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only SEEK is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Recruit CRM | SEEK |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | Not recorded | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Recruit CRM 34 · SEEK 70
7.2 weighted points to SEEK
18% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Recruit CRM 20 · SEEK 40
3.6 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Recruit CRM 42 · SEEK 50
1.0 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Recruit CRM 54 · SEEK 60
0.9 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Recruit CRM 58 · SEEK 62
0.5 weighted points to SEEK
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Recruit CRM 60 · SEEK 64
0.3 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Recruit CRM 34 · SEEK 32
0.3 weighted points to Recruit CRM
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -13.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -13.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Recruit CRM minus SEEK.
| Category | Weight | Recruit CRM | SEEK | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 34 | 70 | -36 | -7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 40 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 34 | 32 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 60 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 54 (F) | -14 | -13.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Recruit CRM | SEEK | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM and SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SEEK last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next