HomeCompareRecruitee vs SmartRecruiters

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Recruitee vs SmartRecruiters

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SmartRecruiters leads Recruitee on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters finishes 20 points clear of Recruitee inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 62 (D) against 42 (F). SmartRecruiters leads every one of the 7 criteria, Recruitee none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Recruitee 58 to SmartRecruiters 62. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Recruitee 30, SmartRecruiters 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Recruitee and SmartRecruiters are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordRecruiteeSmartRecruiters
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersNLUS
Founded20152010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Recruitee 30 · SmartRecruiters 78

    8.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. 20% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Recruitee 42 · SmartRecruiters 70

    5.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. 15% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Recruitee 27 · SmartRecruiters 45

    2.7 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Recruitee 52 · SmartRecruiters 62

    1.5 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Recruitee 40 · SmartRecruiters 48

    1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Recruitee 58 · SmartRecruiters 62

    0.5 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Recruitee 58 · SmartRecruiters 63

    0.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Recruitee minus SmartRecruiters.

CategoryWeightRecruiteeSmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4270-28-5.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3078-48-8.6
FRIA Support15%2745-18-2.7
Data Governance Disclosure15%5262-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5862-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4048-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%5863-5-0.4
Total100%42 (F)62 (D)-20-20.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightRecruiteeSmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1110Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%147Sources on the vendor's own domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.