§ The result
TestGorilla leads Recruiterflow on 6 of the 7 criteria.
TestGorilla sits 11 points above Recruiterflow under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 36 — with TestGorilla filed under Assessment and Recruiterflow under ATS-integrated. TestGorilla leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Recruiterflow is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 TestGorilla leads is Human Oversight Design, Recruiterflow 58 to TestGorilla 60. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (Recruiterflow 18, TestGorilla 38) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Recruiterflow 33, TestGorilla 52), 37% of the weighted advantage TestGorilla builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Recruiterflow
Recruiterflow is an ATS and CRM for recruiting agencies and executive search firms. Its AIRA AI layer ranks candidates already in a firm's database against each job with an explainable 0–100 Criteria Score (AIRA Matchmaker, shown as the 'AI Matches' card), and adds natural-language candidate search, external profile sourcing and an AI call notetaker that fills in interview scorecards.
Vendor profile
TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform offering a large test library plus AI features for resume scoring, candidate sourcing, and one-way/conversational AI video interviews to support skills-based hiring.
§ The record
Recruiterflow is filed under ATS-integrated AI, TestGorilla under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only TestGorilla is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Recruiterflow | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Recruiterflow 33 · TestGorilla 52
3.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
18% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Recruiterflow 18 · TestGorilla 38
3.6 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Recruiterflow 44 · TestGorilla 56
1.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Recruiterflow 33 · TestGorilla 38
0.6 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Recruiterflow 58 · TestGorilla 60
0.2 weighted points to TestGorilla
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Recruiterflow 56 · TestGorilla 58
0.2 weighted points to TestGorilla
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -10.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Recruiterflow minus TestGorilla.
| Category | Weight | Recruiterflow | TestGorilla | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 33 | 52 | -19 | -3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 38 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 56 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 33 | 38 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 58 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 47 (F) | -11 | -10.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Recruiterflow | TestGorilla | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Recruiterflow has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Recruiterflow, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Recruiterflow last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestGorilla last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next